Subject	I think the key statement in your post is...
Posted by	RSR on September 13, 2006 at 9:17 AM
	This message has been viewed 68 times.
In Reply To	The engine mounts. ;-) posted by Ash's Z on September 12, 2006 at 10:48 PM
Message	...to paraphrase....that all elements play a roll, and these are complex systems. Many, many interactions. One cannot expect to be able to point at one piece and claim that it is the reason for the difference.
Follow Ups	who all is pushing 550-600 rwhp and using BB Turbos? (n/m) - boostedzxtt 09:30:07 09/12/06 Re: who all is pushing 550-600 rwhp and using BB Turbos? (n/ - DrDCanaceu 09:36:04 09/12/06 I'm going to have to get ahold of you by email again... - BOOZTD 3 10:53:45 09/12/06 Hi. Why do you ask? Check profile. (n/m) - Scotts94z32 09:42:32 09/12/06 Can you please post the chart? (n/m) - EricTTZ 12:29:07 09/12/06 >>> - Scotts94z32 13:26:47 09/12/06 Ok, I get to test drive your car sometime now :-D (n/m) - BigTDogg (MA) 14:35:23 09/12/06 "BB Turbos"? Can you perhaps generalize a bit more? :-P (n/m) - Z-Jay (Edmonton, AB) 09:46:36 09/12/06 try polls forum. vote yes if so and no if not. (n/m) - nemo1080 10:27:20 09/12/06 Everybody! Aren't you? (n/m) - RSR 11:53:54 09/12/06 Closer to 600whp...check my profile > (n/m) - mr. zed line 13:33:21 09/12/06 660+RWHP with non-ballbearing turbos here. =) - Ash's Z 17:28:33 09/12/06 What is giving you so much power/torque at 4k rpm? - CaliguyPurdue 19:32:05 09/12/06 The engine mounts. ;-) - Ash's Z 22:48:24 09/12/06 I think the key statement in your post is... - RSR 09:17:13 09/13/06 don't forget the NA rear... - Shawn300zTT GT28R MD 10:51:21 09/13/06 No, it actually has tendency to hurt spoolup >>>>> - Ash's Z 12:24:44 09/13/06 Good stuff... thanks for the info! (n/m) - Shawn300zTT GT28R MD 22:29:19 09/13/06
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.